22 July 2026
Satsuma shareholders have voted to liquidate the company’s Bitcoin and delist its shares, exposing the central weakness of the smaller Bitcoin treasury-company boom. Holding Bitcoin is not a substitute for building a business, and the companies that arrived late, bought high, and never developed real cash flow may now be forced to unwind one by one.
Satsuma is finished.
Shareholders voted to liquidate the company’s remaining Bitcoin holdings, return the capital, and pull the stock from the London market. The vote wasn't even close: 90% supported the wind-down.
Satsuma was one of the smaller public companies that attempted to build its entire identity around holding Bitcoin on its balance sheet without having any real revenue streams. Oh, it had a story but it also bought late, bought high, watched the value of its holdings fall, and eventually found itself with shareholders who wanted whatever money remained returned to them.
This is exactly the problem with the Bitcoin treasury-company copycat model.
A company cannot survive indefinitely by sitting on cash, Bitcoin, or some other financial asset and then using that asset to manufacture increasingly complicated ways to raise capital instead of, you know, actually generating some. "Complicated" may create accounting income. It may create exciting investor presentations. It may even create a temporary premium in the stock. But it's not a business.
A real company has to sell something. It needs a product, a service, customers, and positive cash flow. Finding something people are willing to pay for is difficult. Understanding that you must have something people are willing to pay for is not difficult at all.
The smaller Bitcoin treasury companies ignored that distinction and continue to do so at their peril. They looked at Strategy, saw the capital markets machine Michael Saylor had built, and decided they could do the same thing. They couldn't, can't, and won't.
They were too small to create the same financial instruments, too obscure to generate the same investor attention, and too late to accumulate Bitcoin at anything resembling Strategy’s early cost basis. By the time many of them arrived, the largest treasury companies had already helped push the price upward. The smaller firms entered after the opportunity had changed, but they acted as though the original playbook still applied.
It did not.
Satsuma bought most of its Bitcoin at an average price above $113,000. With Bitcoin trading far below that level, the company’s treasury was sitting on steep losses. Its shares had already collapsed from their peak, and the company had begun selling Bitcoin under liquidity pressure before shareholders finally forced this total, final liquidation.
More will come.
There are plenty of small Bitcoin treasury companies with weak operating businesses, limited access to capital, impatient shareholders, and Bitcoin positions accumulated at unfavorable prices. As pressure builds, boards and shareholders will face the same choice Satsuma faced: raise more money into a skeptical market (yeah, not gonna happen) or sell the Bitcoin and return what remains.
The direct selling may not be large enough to crush the Bitcoin market by itself. The larger risk is sentiment. Every new liquidation will create another headline announcing that a Bitcoin treasury company has failed. The market will not patiently distinguish between a failed corporate structure and a failed monetary asset. Most people will simply absorb the message that “another Bitcoin company is in trouble.”
None of this means Bitcoin has failed. It means weak companies headed by weaker minds adopted Bitcoin without solving the basic problem every company must solve: how to produce value and earn revenue.
Bitcoin can strengthen a balance sheet. It cannot replace a business model.
Satsuma is no more. We have a few fistfuls of "stupid" to rid ourselves of so let the game begin.
Circle P:
Everstone
Eternal Digital Memorials on Bitcoin
Website: https://everstonebtc.com
Contact: press@everstone.io
Satsuma Bitcoin liquidation
Bitcoin treasury companies
Bitcoin corporate treasury strategy
Satsuma shareholder vote
Bitcoin treasury company risks
Member discussion: